positive presidential campaigning

Should presidential candidates stick to positive campaigning and discuss issues or engage in negative campaigning and smear all(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal)? The policy-making mankind now and days has fetch very corrupted. kinda of trying to highlight where each presidential candidate stands on issues that atomic number 18 happening now, people ar waying on things in the past. I believe no whiz is perfect and candidates are no different than invariable people. The political world needs to put emphasis on the issues that not only the United States is facing but that the hale world is facing as well. Todays media porees on negatives. We sphere about tragedies in the news, read about the livestock grocery crashing, but seldom do we hear about where a candidates stands on a certain issue. Unless a mortal has soundly researched a candidate, the people will only hear and settle biased opinions on them. It seems like every other commercial on TV is either one ob stetrical rescue down Obama paid by McCain or one engage down McCain paid by Obama.

If people dont hear the positives of candidates and only the negatives then they will be adjudge to choose the candidate that is the lesser of two evils. The peoples vote shouldnt be for the person who they dislike least, it should be for the candidate that they strongly support and that they think is going to do a great job running our country. The media, such as the news on TV and newspapers and even online newspapers, should really focus on giving unbiased reports and shift their focus from the negatives of the candidates to the positives of their campaigns.If you necessary to get a full essay, o rder it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay